Wednesday, 27 February 2013

The Water War


The Water War 
By: Bikal Dhungel 


What will be added to international conflicts in this 21st century? Hardly anyone can guess that it will be water, war for water, yes water that we drink. Water is a public good, at least in many countries and is available freely. 

Two third of planet Earth is covered by water. From this, 97% is salty, hence not drinkable. Among the remaining three percent, 99% of it is stored as ice in North and South Pole or trapped underground. So, only 1% is available for use. Still, this 1% is enough to fulfill the daily needs of all people in the whole world. However,1 billion people around the world have no access to clean water supply and 2.5 billion have no sanitation. This number is huge even though water is a freely available resource provided by the nature. Additional to this fact, 2.1 million children die every year because of water-related disease for example by consuming contaminated water because of the lack of clean water availability

Ignored by the mainstream politics in almost all countries, water is an important issue today that should be addresed. This will engage us in this century intensively because the availability of water is the same but world population is growing in an alarming rate.

In the year 1800, world population was only 1 billion, in 1920 it reached to 2 billion, in 1960 it rised to 3 billion, in the year 2000, it reached to 6 billion and took another 10 years to hit the record of 7 billion. This is not the end, world population is still growing with a very high rate: Every year 80 million more people are born, as much as the population of Germany. With the current rate, we will have crossed the record of 10 billion people by 2050 and another 5 billion at the end of this century. What does this mean? This means an intensified struggle for limited global resources including water. People need resources to survive and given the economic growth of today, people not only need water to drink but they’ll need more amount with the increase of their well-being. For example, an average person in the US today uses 700 liters of water per day whereas most Africans living in rural areas use 30-40 liters per day[1].Now imagine, all Africans and Asians including China and India where over two third of the world population live, using as much water as the americans. With the growth rate of China and India, they are on their best way to catch up with USA and Western Europe. They are already increasing their food consumption, which is one of the main factors of rising food prices throughout the world. Same argument is valid for water consumption.  This will keep the demand of fresh water high and lead to the depletion of natural resources. This case is alarming as we do not know either our planet can sustain this growth when there will be 15 billion people at the end of this century. The scientific community is unsure how to deal with this issue as it is a multi-dimensional problem. The issues of food prices, climate change, bio-fuel, world economy and many more are connected with it. One nation or even many powerful nations cannot solve this, there is either a global solution or nothing. However, the issue of water is the most important one because it is not only vital for our survival but our future and future of our earth also lies in it.

Water is such a fantastic thing to talk about. It is the most essential factor for humans after air to survive but it is also one of the most dangerous killers. Water pollution causes various diseases like Hepatitis A, Typhoid, Diahhroea, Arsenicosis, Cholera, Fluorosis, Guinea Worm disease, Malaria etc. Diahhroea alone has 4 billion cases per year with 1.5 million deaths[2]. In a typical year in Africa, 5-10 times the number of people die from Diarrhoea than from war[3]. Diseases have immense affect in human lives. Due to water related illness, 443 million school days are lost every year.

But the story of water is not only about the disease related to it. There is a much bigger issue going on. Its about the unfair distribution of water, its about the wars that are being fought only because of the power struggle about who should get how much. We don’t only need water to drink, we also need it for industries, for irrigation and many other purposes. Agriculture is responsible for about 70% of the world’s water usage, industry needs another 22%. An important task of any government is to insure that its citizens get enough on their plates. Hence, enhancing agriculture is an important task. Nomatter how many varieties of foods you see in the supermarket, all of them have their origin on the field. For example wheat is required to make our daily bread, noodles, biscuits, beverages, beer and many other varieties of foods that we consume everyday[4]. According to Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), alltogether in 2010 over 2 billion tons of wheat, maize and rice was produced ( 1 ton= 1000 kg). It takes 2000-5000 liters of water to produce one person’s daliy food[5] . Now imagine how much a person eats out of wheat or rice or maize in a day and how much water is actually neccesary to produce all of these billions of tons of crops. This is why countries fight for water because their lifelines lie there. If they don’t get the water, they will not survive. Especially in developing countries, a large portion of people rely on agriculture, in many countries as much as 80%.

Due to the differences in geographies, there are dry places on earth where there is no or little water resources. Saudi Arabia for example, is the world’s largest oil producer but they have no single river and no source of fresh water. Being a rich country, they can afford desalination, a process of turning salty sea water into fresh water in an artificial way but with a natural procedure but most of the developing coutries cannot afford this, it is an expensive method and requires lots of energy. This is why many people of some parts of sub-saharan Africa should walk many miles every day to get water. The scarcity has led to problems, in small and large scale water conflicts. 

In every continent, there is a conflict related to water. Jordan River, where Jesus Christ was baptized is the source of conflict between Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel and Palestine. Every country built large dams in order to store water for their purpose that causes a large damage in eco-system. In the future, Jordan River might not reach the country Jordan from what it is named for because too much water is being taken out. The Dead Sea, where Jordan River actually ends, is also the lowest point on earth’s surface, has a high evaporation rate. With this rate, the amount of water there will shrink and scientific community doesn’t know what kind of impact that will have in our eco-system. But eco-system is of less concern about these countries, the bigger issues is about who will take how much water and either it is fair. The Arab-Israeli war of 1967, also called ‘Six day War ‘had its origin in water disputes between Israel and its Arab neighbours. Israel won the war and took 60% of water which the Arabs often cite as unfair[6]. From that time onwards, in every Arab-Israeli peace negotiation, water has always been the important topic. 

River Nile, which flows through 12 countries in East and North Africa, is an imporant source of fresh water in the region. It is also a matter of conflict between the nations.  East African countries like Uganda, Ethiopia, and Kenya frequently mention that they are handled unfairly and that Egypt is having massive advantage from the river. Many negotiations have taken place in the past to resolve the dispute. For all these countries, Nile’s water is important for their agriculture and economic development.

The Middle East has 5% of the world population but only 1% of world’s fresh water that is freely available[7]. Other notable conflict in the Middle East is over Tigris and Euphrates between Iraq, Turkey and Syria. Bit further in central Asia, Kazakstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikstan and Kyrgyszstan are fighting for Aral Sea water. 
Once, Kyrgyszstan cut off the water to Kazakstan until coal is delivered and Uzbekistan did the same to Kazakstan for not paying the debt. These insecurities of water have resulted in building huge dams for water conservation. It is in fact a good technique for securing the water need for the future but is also connected with other vulnarabilities and risks. In 2008, the Taliban threatened to blow up Warsak Dam in Peshawar, Pakistan. Warsak Dam is not only the primary source of water in the region but also, if the Taliban blow it up, hundreds of thousands will die from flood and many others will have no water to drink. Similarly, in Srilanka, the Tamil Tiger rebels cut the water supply to the government-held villages leaving people waterless. The conflict caused 425 lives. Terrorist group Al-Quida has frequently threatened to poison the drinking water in Western and American cities. In 2002, Italian police allegedly arrested four Morrocans for planning to contaminate the water supply system in Rome with a cyanide based chemicals. In the same year in Nepal, the the Khumbuwan Liberation Front (KLF) blew up a hydro-electric powerhouse in Bhojpur district. The Maoist terrorists have destroyed more than seven micro-hydroelectric projects as well as drinking water projects and pipeline supplying water to western Nepal. Innocent people have suffered and even lost lives[8].

Importance of water is increasing, especially in the economically booming areas for their industries, hydro-power, irrigation etc. So, human activities are intervening too much in the natural flow of water. Human activities have pulled so much water out of the rivers that Indus River on the Indian sub-continent, Yellow river in China or the Rio-Grande along the US-Mexico border that they now either disappear before reaching the sea or contain sections that seasonally run dry[9]. This is a sad thing because Rivers have historical meanings, they played an important part in our history and they helped human beings to prosper, by helping us to transfer our goods from one place to another throughout the past. 

The Indus Valley Civilization dates back to five thousand years, started from about 3300-1300 BCE. The largest civilizations in human history were based on three rivers, the Nile Valley Civilization in present day Egypt, which was the earliest civilization, Indus Valley Civilization in South Asia and Yellow River Civilization in China. Mega cities like London, Paris, Tokyo, Shanghai and New York City all have a history of prosperity that was supported by the rivers, their water. Without the in-land water system in Great Britain, its industrialization would have taken another direction. Inner European trade would not be so strong without the rivers that are there. The river Rhein that originates from the Alps Mountains and ends in the North Sea helped the trade pattern of Austria, Switzerland, France, Germany and Netherlands. Still today, Rhein is one of the busiest Ship routes in Europe. Many big cities have been created at the shores of Rhein. we can count what kind of cities lies; Basel, Strassburg, Karlsruhe, Mannheim, Mainz, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf, Duisburg, Rotterdam, Utrecht etc to name the few. Hence, how much importance these cities have today in European economy is immeasurable. Hence, rivers are the origin of human civilization and we need to protect it and share its water in a fair way among the fellow citizens and give the best to solve the problem of water.

In an international level, the crisis of water is known to us all, the Climate Change. Rising sea level water threatens our survival. The ice on Greenland and the Anctarctic are melting. If the temperature rises by 3 degree in Greenland, all the ice will start to melt. In about 100 years, there will be no ice remaining and that will cause the sea level rise by 7 meters. When the sea-level rises by 1 meter, 20 countries will perish from the world. So, imagine all ice of Greenland melts and the sea level rise to 7 meters worldwide[10].That has catastrophic consequences.  7 meters rise means all the east coast cities of USA will be gone, from Boston to Miami, including New York City, Jacksonville, Newark and many other cities in-between. Highly populated areas like Bangladesh with its 145 million people will completely disappear. From Belgium to North-eastern Germany, including the cities of Hamburg, Kiel, Amsterdam, Copenhagen will all be gone. In Africa, high populated areas like Niger Delta, East Africa will face problems. The most vulnerable areas are in Africa, Asia and Europe. The UN estimates that there will be 634 million climate refugees[11]. Can we afford so many refugees? Who will take them all? We already have a world where Refugees are unwanted everywhere. Refugees always face descriminations in everyday life. Without required papers, it is hard for them to find a job to live a decent life. We can see so many Refugee camps in many countries full of people  who arrived from their villages due to voilence, political problems, war, famine and natural catastrophe and hope to find a place for them and their children where they should not fear death. They are forced to move in search of a better life. Despite the suffering of Refugees, whereever an Asylum center will be planned, we encounter a massiv opposition of the locals, mainly in Europe. People seem to be hostile towards immigrants and refugees. In this situation, we need to think where such a large climate refugees should go in the future. Anyway, this is the topic for the future. And when Antarctic ice melts, 55 meters of sea level rise[12]. 55 meters sea-level rise is a horror scenario. We will be depressed to know which places we will never see again above water.

This problem of climate change is in global level. In national level, as I mentioned above, there are many conflicts between more countries regarding water. The greatest problem however is in the local level. Whereever there is scarcity, there will be conflict. A village somewhere in Africa has just one well as a source of water, now imagine thousands of people are living there who need to feed their family, livestocks etc. There are thousands of examples where the individuals are fighting with each other for water, sometimes even killing the neighbours etc. Water is a matter of life and death, so people do anything to get it. In India few years ago, when Coca Cola Company pulled too much water from the wells to make Coca Cola, sources of fresh water dried and there were no water in the wells. This resulted in massive protests because the locals had no water left to drink. That lead to a national discussion in India and ethical consumers throughout the world boycotted Coca Cola for such activities. Big Oil corporations in Niger Delta contaminated the water but still nothing happens because Oil companies can bribe the public officials easily who are then reluctant to pass any regulations against big multi-national oil companies. In other countries, companies have contaminated the water resources with their waste. Not only big and small companies, even people with their household waste contaminate water resources. 90% of waste water in developing countries is discharged into rivers or streams without any treatment[13]. In the city of Kathmandu, all the household waste will be directed to Bagmati River. Bagmati will merge with other rivers at some point and people again use that water for drinking purposes, for agriculture and for animals. This again has a very bad implication in human health. This will lead to an increased number of diseases and the health-care cost overall. We can see this picture in other places too, where animals take bath in a pond, where people throw their waste and others take the same water for drinking purposes. Due to the lack of waste management and recycling techniques, developing countries are facing this problem. Hence, it is a responsibility of countries that have efficient recycling technologies to help the countries that do not, because this contaminated water will finally flow to the Ocean and it has bad implications for the eco-system as a whole and it affects the whole earth.

To conclude everything, a major problem our generation is facing today has its roots in water. Be it a conflict for drinking water in individual villages, be it a war for a river, be it water contamination or terrorism or climate change, until and unless we seriously sit down together to find a genuine solution that is also fair, we will spend a long time in the future to resolve this crisis. It is important to accept that water is not only essential for survival, but also a human right. A right to safe drinking water and sanitation should finally be granted. The millenium development goals (MDG) target this right but in implication, it is still far away. This was shown by the fact that, after 13 years of signing MDG, still almost a billion people have no access to clean drinking water and other billions have no proper sanitation. It is time to agree that in some problems of 21st century, there is only global solution, for example water. Today we have a technology, an ability to finance this and a neccesity to do this, so we should take a one step ahead in order to make it a reality that someday no woman should walk 5 miles everyday to collect water, no child should die of Diarrhoea, no man should kill his neighbour to get one additional pot of water and no war should be fought anymore for water. This is the world I envision, a world without a water war.


Sources: 


[2] Unicef: http://www.unicef.org/wash/index_wes_related.html , retrieved 23. Feb. 2013)
[4] Cauvain, Stanley P. & Cauvain P. Cauvain. (2003) Bread Making. CRC Press. p. 540.ISBN 1-85573-553-9.
 [12] ( Source: University of California, Irvine, lecture slides of public Health, retrieved 27th feb.2013)




Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Facts About Foreign Students in Germany

Datas/Facts About Foreign Students studying in Germany 

i) Total Foreign Students in German Universities : ca 245,000 (ca 12%) 

ii) Largest Groups – China, Russia, Poland,  Bulgaria, Turkey 

iii) University with highest portion of foreigners in percentage – Universität zu Köln 

iv) Fachhochschule with highest portion of foreigners in percentage – Fachhochschule Köln 

v) Average Percentage of students who finance their stay themselves – 54% 

vi) Main Problems of students : Orientation in studies, Finance, Contacts with other students, Room 

vii) Best Universities for Technical Subjects : TU Berlin, RWTH Aachen, TU Munich, 

viii) Best Universities for Economical Subjects: Uni Mannheim, Uni Köln, Uni Bonn

ix) Best Universities for Medicine: Charite Berlin, Uni Heidelberg, Uni Bonn

x) Largest teaching Universities : Uni Köln, Uni Munich, Uni Hamburg 

xi) Largest teaching Fachhochschule : FH Köln, FH Munich 

Facts: 

i)                    Germany is third attractive country in the world for higher education after USA and UK

ii)                   81% of students came here for full time studies

iii)                 19% came as exchange or guest students

iv)                 49% of Foreign Students work in vacations 

v)                  47% student’s first choice was Germany for further education 


Source: http://www.studentenwerke.de/pdf/Internationalisierungbericht.pdf 

Friday, 4 January 2013

Killing is Wrong

                                     


By: Bikal Dhungel 



“To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, it is not justice

Death Penalty is the violation of International Human Rights law, Article 5, which says “ No one should be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment “ . India and Nepal are being shaken these days by terrible rape crimes. The offenders of Delhi rape case have been arrested and the overwhelming majority is demanding a death penalty. Also the Nepalese in facebook are posting, liking and sharing informations about the cruelty of men and also demanding for death penalties for the rapists. 

Death Penalty doesn’t exist in Nepal, it has already been abolished. It is good that it has been abolished because a state, a country cannot kill people. Its job is to bring the guilty into justice and not to violate the rights of life, even of a criminal. 

The crimes that have been commited are disturbing, no doubt. Such crimes do not belong to a civilized society, no doubt. The guilties should be punished, no doubt. But killing them is definitely not a solution. It doesn’t stop crimes in the future. The US states with death penalties have far higher crime rates than the states that do not. How come? 

I think this is the right time to tell my fellow human beings that Death Penalty is wrong. As a long time member of Amnesty International, a human rights organization that fights for human’s rights, I strongly oppose Death Penalty because it is inhuman and hold the motto ‘Killing in wrong’ whatsoever. 

The United States Census bereau’s report about violent crime in 2006 says that South Carolina, Tennesse and Nevada were the most criminal states in the US. All of them have Death Penalty. Whereas, Vermont, North Dakota and Maine ranked nr 48th, 49th and 50th, all of these three states have abolished death penalties. If you see in international level, crime rates are five times lower in Western Europe than in the United States and in Western Europe, Death Penalty doesn’t exist. This clearly shows that Death Penalty doesn’t reduce crimes, rather it increases. Research about human psychology also shows that people fear life imprisonment more than death. Life imprisonment means more or less suffering the whole life but death means, you suffer for a while and then its over. Hence, death penalty is always counter-productive. 

Another FBI report shows that since the Death Penalty was reinstated, over 100 inmates were already been freed from death row, which means that these people taken to kill were infact innocents. It is not easy to imagine somebody being executed and later revealing the truth that he was innocent. 

As long as we don’t go to the root of the problem, these crimes will continue recurring in the future. Dealth Penalty is neither philosophically correct nor logical in order to reduce crime. Even though the majority of people demand this, it should not be brought into existence. Lots of Indians and Nepalis today are asking for ‘death to the rapists’ and it is not right. 

Leaders and law makers should sometimes ignore the opinions of the majority if it is not ethical. This is the very time when it reminds us that democracy is not always the best system. Democracy is also the tyranny of the majority towards the minority. Only when the rights of minorities are secured, democracy becomes a fully acceptable system. Many times in history, we encountered the tyranny of majority towards minorities which seemed to be right at that time in the mind of people but later turned out to be a terrible crime against humanity. The history of Germany depicts the fact when Adolf Hitler became successful in manipulating the mind of German people after elected Chancellor in 1933. He successfully installed hate towards the Jews and other minorities in people’s mind who inturn became ready to fight for Hitler’s cause. This eventually resulted in history’s most terrible crime against humanity, the Holocaust which killed 6 million Jews in Europe and World War II, which cost the life of over 70 million people worldwide. 

Similarly in Rwandan Genocide, the Hutus killed 1 million Tutsis within 90 days. The killers were not only the Hutu Militants but also normal people who lived together for centuries. Neighbours killed neighbours , expressed fantastically in Mahmood Mamdani’s book ‘ When Victims Become Killers’.  A leader who posses power, could have avoided such massacres. 

In the Balkan war in former Yugoslavia, in the time of burning hate towards each other, the Croatians, Serbians, Bosnians and Kosovans killed each other. A big war in the heart of Europe took place and would probably take a long time to heal. War broke out because of the angry crowd, brain-washed and manipulated. A powerful leadership could have ignored the opinion of majorities and found other solution to the problem without bloodbath and could have avoided all these events. 

Angry crowd is a dangerous thing. They are dangerous because human mind is irrational. Duke University Psychologist Dan Ariely writes in his book ‘Predictably Irrational’ that humans act irrationally in hot situations. We all have experienced this at least once. Remember yourself in a time when you were so nervous for example in exams and you could not write what you actually knew. Or remember a stressful situation when your mind wasn’t in a condition of balanced thinking and you took stupid decision. These things happen to everybody. 

Hence, it takes a courageous leader to stand alone and be against the crowd for the good cause of society. Death Penalty doesn’t belong to a civilized world. A leader should speak this out even though his people are angry, like today. Mahatma Gandhi once said “Never apologize for being correct, many people especially ignorant people want to punish you for speaking the truth, for being correct, for being you, for being years ahead of your time. If you are right and you know it, speak your mind. Even if you are a minority of one, truth is still the truth. “ So, let truth and non-violence prevail. 

In one side, such things forces the society for change, hopefully for better. In the other side, we should always take time to make laws so that we don’t regret later. But unfortunately it always takes such dreadful events for change. Had we dealt with these issues before, we could have avoided such terrible acts. 

In the other hand, the people accused of rape crimes also feel guilty about that. I am not supporting them; obviously no crime is good to be forgiven. They deserve punishment but they should still be granted fair trail and should be punished according to the law. However, humans are wonderful creatures. They have the ability to change, to learn and again to be a better person. Humans also have an immense power of forgiveness. 

It is hard for the victim’s family to forgive the offenders but what other option do they have? Let us more focus on the future so that such crimes could be avoided. This time, let us ask our government to grant a fair trail but not a death penalty. Again, Death Penalty doesn’t belong to a civilized society. Let us forgive and move forward. If there are some people who still believe that forgiveness is not possible, I recommend you to read/research about Rwandan Genocide until you read about a tutsi woman who married her hutu neighbour who killed four of her children in Rwandan Genocide. This was how Rwanda healed itself from the genocide and perhaps stands today, proudly, as the safest place in Africa.

Sunday, 18 November 2012

For a Patriot

                                                                 

By: Bikal Dhungel




In this article I focus on four different issues, the one sided history of Nepal, the issues of Buddha, Nepalese Nationalism and current choices in political leadership. 

History was always written by the winners. The winners determine how to present historical facts to the future generation who often disregard the suffering of losers. This results in mind manipulation of future generation and hides the truth and neutrality. 

So called ‘Father of Modern Nepal’, Prithvi Narayan Shah is regarded as unifier of Nepal. Raising war with small kingdoms scattered throughout the areas of present day Nepal, he slowely created a single nation. This is why millions of Nepalese regard him as a unifier, a saviour, a hero. But barely any textbook presents the suffering of people by his hands. Fact is he did not acquire other kingdoms by peaceful means, rather by voilent means. No records of how many people were killed, how many houses were destroyed, memories lost and no account of financial losses. 

As a child he was sent to live in Bhaktapur with the kings to learn politics. Inturn, in the process of war in Kathmandu Valley, Prithvi Narayan killed the same people who taught him and who raised him in Bhaktapur. This is like killing your own parents. In the battle of Kritipur, where Prithvi Narayan was defeated twice and where he lost his close brother and a powerful commander Kalu Pandey from his batallion, after winning the third battle, he ordered to cut the ears and noses of every youth and man in Kritipur. Wasn’t that the cruelest act ever? A king with a vision of unifying a large number of kingdoms to create a greater Nepal had infact a huge ingredient of hate inside him. His aim was not to unify the kingdoms for the sake of people rather to be the king of everybody for personal gains and prestige. Hence, Nepalese, your ‘Father of Nation’ Prithvi Narayan Shah is a mass murderer ( as per the modern definition of ethics ). He was a colonizer who had imperial dreams and acquired it disregarding the lives of people including women and  children. Having said that, it should also not be forgotten that, whatsoever, PNS unified the nation that was so diverse and at last, for few hundred years, Nepalese took pride of being a diverse nation. But this has many downsides too. Emergence of an kind of force to disturb this unity ( like the Maoists have achieved ) can end in a terrible bloodshed. So, though PNS might have achieved the unification based on his own personal gains, the situation of Nepal remains vulnerable. Note that the aim of this article is not to blame PNS for unifying Nepal, but the display the both sides of the coin, not only the good one.

Since some time, I’ve been noticing a map of Nepal in facebook called ‘Greater Nepal’. Some additional parts were added which does not belong to Nepal anymore. This kind of statements is stupid, foolish and slaps in one’s own face for being unable to think well. You cannot fight to claim the areas that were once part of your country. If so, the Mongolians should claim whole Russia, till Poland and Turkey and Iraq and China because they were all once the part of history’s largest empire called Mongol Empire. If so, the Turkish should claim whole Arabian world till Vienna because it was once Ottoman Empire. If so, the Persians would claim a big part of Asia. Germans would claim half of Poland as it was a part of present day Germany during the rule of Prussia. Sweden would claim Norway as its part, Russia would claim ex Soviet Republics and Britain might ask for all the parts of its empire in six continents. There is no doubt that there were some imbalances in cultural level when the United Kingdom, India and Nepal declared their boundaries. Culturally indian parts came to Nepal and nepalese parts went to India. However, four regions Banke, Bardia, Kailali and Kanchanpur were added to Nepal as a prize for being faithful to the British especially displayed by the Gurkha soldiers in the upraisings of Sepoys in India when the British along with Gurkhas massacred the indian people. This has a huge importance because these regions are bread basket of Nepal especially for rice. Still, it was not a correct dicision to divide the border in such a way. But that time is over and it makes no sense for fighting for these causes today. There are more border problems in the world than the total number of countries, because one country can have more than one border problems. The list will go on if we take account of developing countries. Even highly developed countries are facing this problem. China and Russia are still struggling for the region of Manchuria. Japan and China are still fighting for Senkaku Islands. Sweden and Finland havent solved their territorial disputes over Aland Islands. Similarly, Russia and Ukraine are discussing over Sevastopol. Even in North America, there are disputes over Alaska’s boundry between Canada and United States.   So, there is no sense in fighting for border in today’s time. At least these countries are rich enough to integrate additional areas in their territory but Nepal is poor itself. Its not in a condition to control the traffic system of Kathmandu, why should it bear the burden of more areas consisted of mountains. It has enough homework to do in order to create an economically self-sustaining and peaceful nation, why its people are concentrating on unnecessary stuffs which will have no outcome anyway? 

Keep in mind; humans are by nature, a nomadic volk. They are Nomads, Immigrants. Throughout the history they have immigrated from place to place, in search of better opportunity, to flee natural catastrophes and in the modern times, to flee the voilence and political repressions. The European Aryan people, mainly in today’s Germany, Austria and Scandinavian, immigrated from South and Central Asia. Europeans again immigrated to Americas in search of better life and freedom, to the United States, to Argentina, to Brazil, to Mexico and to many other places. The Carebbeans were originally from Africa, the Australian aborigines arrived in the island continent when due to the cold age, the level of water came down and they stuck there again when the water level got higher. Similarly, people of Nepal in history arrived there from present day Mongolia, Persia and whole South Asia. The origin of Humans can be traced back to East Africa. Hence, there is no actual home country for any person living today. The earth as a whole belongs to everybody. Tracking back your origin can tell you an interesting fact that your great grand parents or great great grandparents were someone before that time actually emigrated from a different place to where you live now. It might be far or it might be very very far. 

Milton Friedman, a nobel prize winner in Economics and a great visionary of 20th century once wrote in his book Capitalism and Freedom, “ to the free man, a country is a collection of individuals who compose it, not something over and above them. But he regards government as a means, an instrumentality, neither grantors of favor and gifts, nor a master of or god to be blindly worshipped and served”. So, we should not mind telling ourselves citizen of the world instead of a tiny area somewhere on earth and claiming that area is yours called a ‘country’ and you are ready to die for it is not a right thing to tell and to do. 

A similar issue is about Lord Buddha. Buddha was born in a place called Lumbini, modern day Nepal. Though some idiots try to spread confusion in virtual and real world about the birthplace being India there is no reason to hate indians and India as a country. This does not give anyone a right to criticize India by blaming and insulting indians in general. Travel throughout India and you will soon discover that the large part of indians love Nepal and of course nepalis. Moreover, the central indian government in Delhi has recognized with clear words that Buddha was born in Nepal and presents no doubts in it. UNESCO does the same. Running behind the fake vibres of internet regarding this topic is stupid enough. Do not forget the fact that Buddha once told that hate can only be ended by love, hate can never be ended through even more hate. It only results in the destruction of both sides. Peace and non-violence has the highest power. Non-Violence in the 20thth century has brought down an empire where the sun never set. So, many Nepalese feel proud that Buddha was born in Nepal but do the actions that is exactly opposite of what Buddha said. How logical is that? . Once again, hate can never end hate, only love can. Especially to those who hate you, you got to love more, to prove that love is more powerful. Try this at home, or at school. 

The works done by Buddha or the teachings he gave is what that made Buddha, not the place he was born. Einstein became famous from his deeds rather than his birthplace. Picasso is known for his paintings and not from his home country. It is less important where somebody was born. It is more important that somebody has done something so that the whole world profits as a whole. If Buddha were born in India, I would follow his teachings the same as I do now, same like I do follow the principles of Gandhi and ignore the fact where he was born.

India and Nepal are a family that share common cultural heritage and somehow similar language yet two different nation-states. Nepalese can/should/must learn many things from the Indians. India’s role in the world is increasing rapidly through its economic growth that was generated by a vast amount of highly educated people and advanced entrepreneurs. An Indian was the richest person of Great Britain and now one of the richest men in Europe when Luxemburg’s steel giant Arcelor merged with Mittal Steels. His name is Laxmi Mittal. The highest salary earner in Germany is the manager of Deutsche Bank, called Anshu Jain, an Indian. The director of world’s largest donor agency, USAID is a doctor named Anup Shah, appointed by president Obama. Amartya Sen was awarded Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998. C.K prahalad is a worldwide known management guru and a professor at the University of Michigan. Raghuram Rajan is the visiting professor at the World Bank, the US central bank Federal Reserve, and to many governments like Sweden and India and is the professor of Finance at the University of Chicago. Nithin Noria was the dean of Harvard Business School. S. Shankar Saastry is the dean of engineering department of University of California, Berkeley. Jagdish Bhagwati was an advisor to World Trade Organization, to the United Nations as well as many other governmental and non governmental organization. He taught at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and currently teaches Economics in Columbia University in New York. The father of Fiber Optics is an Indian called Narindar Singh Kapani. Sabeer Bhatia co-founded Hotmail. 51% of Microsoft’s employees are Indians. Dr. Sanjay Gupta is well known to the regular viewers of CNN. Ajay Banga is the president and CEO of Mastercard. Rajeev Gupta is general manager of Hewlett Packard. Bobby Jindal and Nikki Haley were the governors of Lousiana and South Carolina, states of USA. Kamala Harris is the Attorny General of California. Fareed Zakaria, the moderator of Global Public Square, CNN (the only high profile individual to write 'Buddha was born in India in his book The Post American World ) is likely to be the Foreign Minister of USA in the future. Dr. Ravindra Gujjula was the Mayor of Altlandsberg, Brandenburg, Germany and the member of Social Democratic Party. Sir Anand Satyanand was the governor general of New Zealand.  Similarly, Indians have reached very high level in technology, research and development in the whole world. The list goes on but this is not my intention of this article. Nepalese, think genuinely, how long you are going to blame indians, scold and insult them in facebook while they are toiling upward in the night to become the top in their field in the whole world? How long you will follow the hate preachers and act as stupid as them? Isnt it a time to think for yourself about how to excel in your field instead of pulling others legs? 

Focus on what you can do better and as a country there are many things Nepal should concentrate on including the development and regulation of tourism sector. Tourism is also one of the thing Nepalese take pride of but infact Nepal lies far behind in international tourism arrivals chart. In the year 2008, among 190 countries of the world, Nepal was on 115th place. We have to keep in mind that over 50 countries were small island nations with less population. India, Pakistan and Maldivs had more tourists than Nepal. This shows that Nepal actually lies in the bottom. Hence, tourism is not the sector to be proud of. A lot of homeworks are needed by the government. The second richest country in the world in water resources after Brazil, they say but except saying that, nothing was done from this fresh water availability. Kathmandu valley as well as other big cities has a very high scarcity of water. Whats the use of it if you could do nothing out of it ? One thing for sure is, it does not make sense anymore telling the world that you are second richest country in water resources when there is no fresh water coming to your house. 

When we come back to present day political scenario, now there is a trend in Nepal claiming that the return of Monarchy will be better because of the behaviour of 601 members of parliament. People are supporting Gyanendra though he is well known for trying to abolish democracy in the country. His son is a proved Gangster. How good is the idea of making somebody a king and giving him palaces whereas the poor people have no blankets on the streets, where people in rural parts should walk days if not weeks to get medical treatment and where there is no money for education and infra-structure? This is not the justification of good deeds of current parliamentarians but please tell me any one country, any single country in the world whose transition was peaceful. It took some time to get everything on track. Monarchy played a large role in putting Nepal backward and finally we abolished it and within some time, instead of solving the problems, nepalese are trying to get back to the problem once more, which is a fatal mistake. The history of monarchy in Nepal isnt that long. Remember Prithvi Narayan Shah given some pennies by Bise Nagarchi to launch attacks, remember Tribhuwan borrowing a coat to wear and see Gyanendra who owns a large fortune in such a short period and research how he made this. Monarchy itself for Nepal is a wrong way to govern. It will only prosper the ‘Aasepases’ of the king and not the people.

  In the other hand there are Maoists who, in the name of social justice, killed 14,000 people but still do not understand that in today’s age, any country cant go Maoist. China itself  rejected it 40 years ago. Same with Communism, what Karl Marx had made clear from the beginning that this model is not for developing countries, but still Nepal has a second biggest party running for it knowing that there is hardly any nation remaining in the world that calls itself a communist. See the misery in Cuba. Nepalese should answer few questions now. How long will you carry the flags of these failed model parties dreaming for wealth for yourself? How long you will be an ‘ Aasepase ‘ of the king hoping for an enormous fortune in the cost of poor hardworking nepalese ? How long you need to give away your greed? Every individual should take these questions seriously as, you as a ‘nation’ can only grow together and Nepalese can only flourish together with integrating with the globe in order to create long term prosperity and peace, without any ingredient of hate.